In a recent letter to the Washington Post, browbeating it for daring to pen an article on errors in the IPCC report, David Hilfiker complained stridently that ""Climate-change deniers get too much help from Post story"" and that even though the article was accurate the Post was wrong to run it because: [quote]
""The Feb. 15 front-page article "Missteps weigh on agenda for climate" was infuriating, a perfect example of why so many Americans still don’t believe in the coming crisis of global climate change. Read closely, your article was technically accurate, but the language and placement of information gave the impression that the overwhelming scientific consensus on global climate change might be in danger.""
~ So, he acknowledges that the article was perfectly accurate, but inveighs against it on the grounds that it questions the supposed orthodoxy! Is this a healthy attitude?
I was curious about who would write such a ehtically dubious letter, so I checked out David Hilfiker, esq., and found his ‘spiritual’ website: www.davidhilfiker.com, where he writes "sermons" on the evils of capitalism, in one of which he says: [quote]
————————————————————
""As long as profit maximization, the sanctity of private property, and distribution solely by supply and demand remain the unexamined bases of our economic system, we will not be able to feed the hungry or prevent ecological destruction.
Among those who ardently hope and work for change, there is a different opinion. Many believe that without a fundamental re-orientation in power relationships no change will be possible. It is power, they say, that determines the course of society; until those who rule society are replaced, we cannot expect justice or sustainability
We do not have much time left before environmental catastrophe overtakes us. We won’t find environmental balance unless we deal with injustice. The current economic system cannot bring either justice or sustainability""
————————————————————
– in short, this is a call for revolution to bring about "sustainability". Yet again, you can see the real agenda start to emerge.
IS this letter to WP a good example of the sort of activists we are dealing with on global warming?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/19/AR2010021905037.html
http://www.davidhilfiker.com/docs/Economics/Constitutive%20Rules.htm
.
Technorati Tags: capitalism, david hilfiker, ecological destruction, economic system, environmental balance, evils, global climate change, injustice, ipcc report, orthodoxy, page article, power relationships, private property, profit maximization, quot quot, sanctity, sermons, spiritual website, supply and demand, washington post